俄文版 BRACE QUESTIONNAIRE 问卷的语言文化改编和验证
- 作者: Lein G.A.1, Pavlov I.V.2, Demchenko M.O.1, Zaripova A.V.1, Berezneva O.V.1, Maklakova T.Y.2
-
隶属关系:
- Prosthetic and Orthopedic Center “Scoliologic.ru”
- North-West Scientific-Practical Center of Rehabilitation and Prosthetics “Ortetika”
- 期: 卷 11, 编号 2 (2023)
- 页面: 139-148
- 栏目: Clinical studies
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/turner/article/view/264668
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/PTORS322807
- ID: 264668
如何引用文章
详细
论证。根据文献记载,希腊用于研究接受束身胸衣治疗的儿童和青少年生活质量的问卷(BRACE QUESTIONNAIRE,BRQ)信息丰富且可靠,这一点已在不同国家得到验证。因此,有必要创建一个经过改编的俄语版本并对其进行验证。
目的。本研究旨在对希腊语问卷的俄语版本进行语言文化调整和验证,以调查接受束衣治疗的儿童和青少年的生活质量。
材料和方法。俄语版束身胸衣问卷(Ru-BrQ)的语言文化适应和验证工作分几个阶段进行:直接翻译和反向翻译、问卷的专业知识、初步版本的形成、对104名接受束身胸衣治疗的特发性脊柱侧凸患者进行试点测试、最终版本的创建、使用克朗巴赫α标准和组内相关系数(ICC)评估进行可靠性研究,以及最终版本的提交。
结果。在俄语版束身胸衣问卷中,0%的患者总分达到“最低”水平,0%的患者总分达到“最高”水平。测试的平均分数为72±9.2,复测的平均分数为72.4±9.0。在组内相关系数测量中,一般健康、自尊与审美、活力和社会功能等领域的可靠性极佳(>0.9)。在身体机能和学校活动两个领域的信度良好(0.75-0.9)。情绪功能域和身体疼痛域显示出中等程度的可靠性(0.5-0.75)。根据克朗巴赫α系数,情绪功能和身体疼痛领域的内部一致性良好(≥0.8),其余领域的内部一致性极佳(≥0.9)。皮尔逊相关系数(0.67)表明,俄语版束身胸衣问卷与俄文版SRS-22之间存在明显的相关性。
结论。俄语版本是调查接受束衣治疗的儿童和青少年生活质量的可靠问卷。该问卷与希腊语版本的束身胸衣问卷具有可比性,可推荐用于实践和研究,以评估躯干支撑对儿童和青少年生活质量的影响。
作者简介
Grigory A. Lein
Prosthetic and Orthopedic Center “Scoliologic.ru”
Email: lein@scoliologic.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7904-8688
MD, PhD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)
俄罗斯联邦, Saint PetersburgIvan V. Pavlov
North-West Scientific-Practical Center of Rehabilitation and Prosthetics “Ortetika”
Email: pavlov@scoliologic.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-4486-7840
MD, PhD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)
俄罗斯联邦, Saint PetersburgMikhail O. Demchenko
Prosthetic and Orthopedic Center “Scoliologic.ru”
Email: dmo@scoliologic.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8422-8779
PhD, Cand. Sci. (Econom.)
俄罗斯联邦, Saint PetersburgArina V. Zaripova
Prosthetic and Orthopedic Center “Scoliologic.ru”
Email: behtereva@scoliologic.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-5579-4362
psychologist
俄罗斯联邦, Saint PetersburgOlesya V. Berezneva
Prosthetic and Orthopedic Center “Scoliologic.ru”
Email: o.berezneva@scoliologic.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-2779-4443
psychologist
俄罗斯联邦, Saint PetersburgTaisiya Yu. Maklakova
North-West Scientific-Practical Center of Rehabilitation and Prosthetics “Ortetika”
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: m_t_y@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-7196-9738
PhD, Cand. Sci. (Psychol.)
俄罗斯联邦, Saint Petersburg参考
- Misterska E., Glowacki M., Latuszewska J., et al. Perception of stress level, trunk appearance, body function and mental health in females with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated conservatively: a longitudinal analysis // Quality of Life Research. 2013. Vol. 22. No. 7. P. 1633–1645. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0316-2
- Piantoni L., Tello C.A., Remondino R.G., et al. Quality of life and patient satisfaction in bracing treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis // Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2018. Vol. 13. No. 1. doi: 10.1186/s13013-018-0172-0
- Zimon M., Matusik E., Kapustka B., et al. Conservative management strategies and stress level in children and adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis // Psychiatria Polska. 2018. Vol. 52. No. 2. P. 355–369. doi: 10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/68744
- Cheung P.W.H., Wong C.K.H., Cheung J.P.Y. An insight into the health-related quality of life of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients who are braced, observed, and previously braced // Spine. 2019. Vol. 44. No. 10. P. E596–E605. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002918
- Lin T., Meng Y., Ji Z., et al. Extent of depression in juvenile and adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis during treatment with braces // World Neurosurg. 2019. Vol. 125. P. e326–e335. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.095
- Pezham H., Babaee T., Bagheripour B., et al. Stress level and quality of life of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis during brace treatment // Turk. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2022. Vol. 68. No. 2. P. 231–237. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2022.8467
- Asada T., Kotani T., Sunami T., et al. What factor induces stress in patients with AIS under brace treatment? Analysis of a specific factor using exploratory factor analysis // J. Orthop. Sci. 2021. Vol. 26. No. 6. P. 999–1003. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2020.10.024
- Wang H., Tetteroo D., Arts Ch., et al. Quality of life of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients under brace // Qual. Life Res. 2021. Vol. 30. No. 3. P. 703–711. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02671-7
- Новик А.А, Ионова Т.И. Руководство пo исследованию качества жизни в медицине. Москва: ОЛМАПРЕСС, 2002.
- Новик А.А., Ионова Т.И. Исследование качества жизни в педиатрии. Москва: РАЕН, 2013.
- Губин А.В., Прудникова О.Г., Камышева В.В., и др. Клиническая апробация русскоязычной версии анкеты SRS-22 для взрослых пациентов со сколиозом // Хирургия позвоночника. 2017. Т. 14. № 2. С. 31–40. doi: 10.14531/ss2017.2.31-40
- Vasiliadis E., Grivas T.B., Gkoltsiou K. Development and preliminary validation of Brace Questionnaire (BrQ): a new instrument for measuring quality of life of brace treated scoliotics // Scoliosis. 2006. Vol. 1. P. 7. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-1-7
- Kinel E., Kotwicki T., Podolska A., et al. Polish validation of brace questionnaire // Eur. Spine J. 2012. Vol. 21. No. 8. P. 1603–1608. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2188-0
- Aulisa A.G., Guzzanti V., Galli M., et al. Validation of Italian version of brace questionnaire (BrQ) // Scoliosis. 2013. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 13. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-8-13
- Deceuninck J., Tirat-Herbert A., Rodriguez Martinez N., et al. French validation of the Brace Questionnaire (BrQ) // Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2017. Vol. 12. No. 1. P. 1–5. doi: 10.1186/s13013-017-0126-y
- Gur G., Yakut Y., Grivas T. The Turkish version of the Brace Questionnaire in brace-treated adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis // Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 2018 Vol. 42. No. 2. P. 129–135. doi: 10.1177/0309364617690393
- Lim J.M., Goh T.S., Shin J.K., et al. Validation of the Korean version of the Brace Questionnaire // Br. J. Neurosurg. 2018. Vol. 32. No. 6. P. 678–681. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2018.1501464
- Jafarian F.S., Sadeghi-Demneh E. Validity and reliability of the Persian version of Brace Questionnaire for assessing the quality of life Life in subjects with scoliosis // Arch. Rehabil. 2020. Vol. 21. No. 1. P. 74–87. doi: 10.32598/RJ.21.1.2983.1
- Zhang X., Wang D., Yao M., et al. Reliability and validity of Chinese version of brace questionnaire for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a cross-sectional study // Medicine (Baltimore). 2021. Vol. 100. No. 33. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026965
- Yi H., Chen H., Wang X., et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the Brace Questionnaire // Front. Pediatr. 2022. Vol. 9. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.763811
- Beaton D.E., Bombardier C., Guillemin F., et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures // Spine. 2000. Vol. 25. No. 24. P. 3186–3191. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
- Koo T.K., Li M.Y. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research // J. Chiropr. Med. 2016. Vol. 15. No. 2. P. 155–163. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
- Cronbach L.J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests // Psychometrika. 1951. Vol. 16. P. 297–334.
- Наследов А.Д. IBM SP SS Statistics 20 и AMOS: профессиональный статистический анализ данных. Санкт-Петербург: Питер, 2013.
- Chaddock R.E. Principles and methods of statistics. Boston, New York, 1925.
- Rigo M., Villagrasa M., Gallo D. A specific scoliosis classification correlating with brace treatment: description and reliability // Scoliosis. 2010. Vol. 5. No. 1. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-5-1
补充文件
