纹理分析与放射组学在多发性硬化诊断中的应用:综述
- 作者: Khvastochenko G.I.1, Bryukhov V.V.1, Krotenkova M.V.1
-
隶属关系:
- Russian Center of Neurology and Neurosciences
- 期: 卷 6, 编号 4 (2025)
- 页面: 618-629
- 栏目: 科学评论
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/DD/article/view/373800
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/DD656073
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TNETWF
- ID: 373800
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
脑部多灶性病变,包括多发性硬化,的临床表现具有多样性,并在很大程度上取决于病灶的部位和大小。在某些情况下,此类病变的鉴别诊断仍然是一项复杂的任务。血管性、炎症性、感染性及遗传性疾病在磁共振成像上可能呈现相似的影像学表现,而其评估既受到技术条件的限制,也受限于人类视觉感知能力。近年来,影像学研究中引入了纹理分析和放射组学等新方法,使得能够从医学图像中揭示超出放射科医师视觉评估能力的信息。这些方法包括信号强度的一阶统计分析、灰度共生矩阵和灰度游程矩阵分析、分形分析与小波分析,以及结合机器学习算法构建预测模型。放射组学最初用于肿瘤影像学研究,但目前其应用已扩展至其他疾病的诊断领域。
本文综述了近年来有关纹理分析和放射组学在脱髓鞘性疾病,尤其是多发性硬化鉴别诊断中的研究进展。文献检索在PubMed和eLibrary数据库中进行,检索关键词包括:radiomics (放射组学)、digital image texture analysis(数字影像纹理分析)、multiple sclerosis(多发性硬化)、радиомика(放射组学)、текстурный анализ(纹理分析)、рассеянный склероз(多发性硬化)。检索时间跨度为9年。本综述仅纳入原创性研究(n = 17),这些研究均涉及放射组学和数字图像纹理分析在脱髓鞘性疾病诊断中的应用。
纹理分析和放射组学是评估脱髓鞘性疾病中脑部多灶性病变的有前景的辅助方法。然而,在其应用于临床实践之前,仍需建立最优的纹理特征计算算法,确定最具信息价值的参数,并对获得的影像生物标志物进行标准化和验证。
作者简介
Gleb I. Khvastochenko
Russian Center of Neurology and Neurosciences
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: hvastochenko.g.i@neurology.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-4628-3069
SPIN 代码: 8988-6959
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow
Vasiliy V. Bryukhov
Russian Center of Neurology and Neurosciences
Email: abdomen@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1645-6526
SPIN 代码: 6299-3604
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
俄罗斯联邦, MoscowMarina V. Krotenkova
Russian Center of Neurology and Neurosciences
Email: krotenkova_mrt@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3820-4554
SPIN 代码: 9663-8828
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow参考
- Bryukhov VV, Kulikova SN, Korotenkova MV. State-of-the-art neuroimaging techniques in pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology. 2013;7(3):47–54. EDN: RCNGNX
- Zakharova MN, Askarova LSh, Bakulin IS, et al. Modern principles of multiple sclerosis therapy. In: Diseases of the Nervous System: Mechanisms of Development, Diagnosis and Treatment. Moscow: Buki-Vedi; 2017. P. 563–583. (In Russ.) EDN: DWXVSD
- Walton C, King R, Rechtman L, et al. Rising prevalence of multiple sclerosis worldwide: Insights from the Atlas of MS, third edition. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2020;26(14):1816–1821. doi: 10.1177/1352458520970841 EDN: KZKBAV
- Boynova IV, Samarina DV, Katorova AV, Tokareva NG. Clinical and epidemiological features of multiple sclerosis in the Russian Federation. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2022;(5):139. doi: 10.17513/spno.32006 EDN: RXKCDE
- Eliseeva DD, Zakharova MN. Mechanisms of neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2022;122(7-2):5–13. doi: 10.17116/jnevro20221220725 EDN: IEDSCQ
- Ye H, Shaghaghi M, Chen Q, et al. In vivo proton exchange rate (kex) MRI for the characterization of multiple sclerosis lesions in patients. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2020;53(2):408–415. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27363 EDN: DJQYRX
- Dendrou CA, Fugger L, Friese MA. Immunopathology of multiple sclerosis. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2015;15(9):545–558. doi: 10.1038/nri3871
- Giovannoni G, Butzkueven H, Dhib-Jalbut S, et al. Brain health: time matters in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. 2016;9:S5–S48. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2016.07.003 EDN: YWFZHV
- Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. The Lancet Neurology. 2018;17(2):162–173. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2 EDN: VCVLDN
- Barkhof F. The clinico-radiological paradox in multiple sclerosis revisited. Current Opinion in Neurology. 2002;15(3):239–245. doi: 10.1097/00019052-200206000-00003
- Filippi M. Magnetic resonance techniques in multiple sclerosis. Archives of Neurology. 2011;68(12):1514. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2011.914
- Tavazzi E, Zivadinov R, Dwyer MG, et al. MRI biomarkers of disease progression and conversion to secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics. 2020;20(8):821–834. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2020.1757435 EDN: NQVWRM
- Danchenko IY, Kulesh AA, Drobakha VE, et al. CADASIL syndrome: differential diagnosis with multiple sclerosis. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2019;119(10):128–136. doi: 10.17116/jnevro201911910128 EDN: XRLSFO
- Krotenkova IA, Bryukhov VV, Konovalov RN, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and other demyelinating diseases. Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2019;100(4):229–236. doi: 10.20862/0042-4676-2019-100-4-229-236 EDN: SKMDAN
- Savintseva ZI, Ilves AG, Lebedev VM, et al. Difficulties in the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and Susak syndrome. Diagnostic Radiology and Radiotherapy. 2021;12(1):24–29. doi: 10.22328/2079-5343-2020-12-1-24-29 EDN: AXHHKG
- Litvin AA, Burkin DA, Kropinov AA, Paramzin FN. Radiomics and digital image texture analysis in oncology (review). Modern Technologies in Medicine. 2021;13(2):97–106. doi: 10.17691/stm2021.13.2.11 EDN: AITKVR
- Kimpe T, Tuytschaever T. Increasing the number of gray shades in medical display systems—how much is enough? Journal of Digital Imaging. 2006;20(4):422–432. doi: 10.1007/s10278-006-1052-3 EDN: GSXTLG
- Alic L, Niessen WJ, Veenland JF. Quantification of heterogeneity as a biomarker in tumor imaging: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10):e110300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110300
- Nioche C, Orlhac F, Boughdad S, et al. LIFEx: A freeware for radiomic feature calculation in multimodality imaging to accelerate advances in the characterization of tumor heterogeneity. Cancer Research. 2018;78(16):4786–4789. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-0125
- Choi JY. Radiomics and deep learning in clinical imaging: what should we do? Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2018;52(2):89–90. doi: 10.1007/s13139-018-0514-0 EDN: HHOKSZ
- Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H. Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology. 2016;278(2):563–577. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015151169
- Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, et al. Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. European Journal of Cancer. 2012;48(4):441–446. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.036
- Zhang M, Wang Y, Lv M, et al. Trends and hotspots in global radiomics research: a bibliometric analysis. Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment. 2024;23. doi: 10.1177/15330338241235769 EDN: ZCAHJC
- Liu Y, Dong D, Zhang L, et al. Radiomics in multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. European Radiology. 2019;29(9):4670–4677. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06026-w EDN: HUUABH
- Kocak B, Baessler B, Cuocolo R, et al. Trends and statistics of artificial intelligence and radiomics research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, and Medical Imaging: bibliometric analysis. European Radiology. 2023;33(11):7542–7555. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09772-0 EDN: DHATXP
- Scapicchio C, Gabelloni M, Barucci A, et al. A deep look into radiomics. La Radiologia Medica. 2021;126(10):1296–1311. doi: 10.1007/s11547-021-01389-x EDN: CFTFXK
- Morozov SP, Chernyaeva GN, Bazhin AV, et al. Validation of diagnostic accuracy of anartificial intelligence algorithm for detecting multiple sclerosis in a city polyclinic setting. Diagnostic Radiology and Radiotherapy. 2020;11(2):58–65. doi: 10.22328/2079-5343-2020-11-2-58-65 EDN: BZSYPH
- Luo X, Li H, Xia W, et al. Joint radiomics and spatial distribution model for MRI-based discrimination of multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, and myelin-oligodendrocyte-glycoprotein-IgG-associated disorder. European Radiology. 2023;34(7):4364–4375. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10529-y
- Nioche C, Orlhac C, Buvat I. Texture—user guide: Local Image Features Extraction. 2019. Avaliable from: https://www.lifexsoft.org/images/UserGuide/TextureUserGuide.pdf
- Weber CE, Wittayer M, Kraemer M, et al. Quantitative MRI texture analysis in chronic active multiple sclerosis lesions. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2021;79:97–102. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2021.03.016 EDN: TIKTJC
- Shi Z, Ma Y, Ding S, et al. Radiomics derived from T2-FLAIR: the value of 2- and 3-classification tasks for different lesions in multiple sclerosis. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. 2024;14(2):2049–2059. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-1287 EDN: LHDZJZ
- Faustino R, Lopes C, Jantarada A, et al. Neuroimaging characterization of multiple sclerosis lesions in pediatric patients: an exploratory radiomics approach. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2024;18:1294574. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1294574 EDN: RNNXQT
- Khajetash B, Talebi A, Bagherpour Z, et al. Introducing radiomics model to predict active plaque in multiple sclerosis patients using magnetic resonance images. Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express. 2023;9(5):055004. doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/ace261 EDN: HDXOFH
- Tavakoli H, Pirzad Jahromi G, Sedaghat A. Investigating the ability of radiomics features for diagnosis of the active plaque of multiple sclerosis patients. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2023;13(5):421–432. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2302-1597
- Peng Y, Zheng Y, Tan Z, et al. Prediction of unenhanced lesion evolution in multiple sclerosis using radiomics-based models: a machine learning approach. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. 2021;53:102989. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.102989 EDN: IISAZL
- Shekari F, Vard A, Adibi I, Danesh-Mobarhan S. Investigating the feasibility of differentiating MS active lesions from inactive ones using texture analysis and machine learning methods in DWI images. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. 2024;82:105363. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.105363 EDN: KIMYMB
- Caruana G, Pessini LM, Cannella R, et al. Texture analysis in susceptibility-weighted imaging may be useful to differentiate acute from chronic multiple sclerosis lesions. European Radiology. 2020;30(11):6348–6356. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06995-3 EDN: OKAYUH
- Michoux N, Guillet A, Rommel D, et al. Texture analysis of T2-weighted MR images to assess acute inflammation in brain MS lesions. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(12):e0145497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145497
- Li T, Chen X, Jing Y, et al. Diagnostic value of multiparameter MRI-based radiomics in pediatric myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody–associated disorders. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2023;44(12):1425–1431. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.a8045 EDN: IKDICQ
- He T, Zhao W, Mao Y, et al. MS or not MS: T2-weighted imaging (T2WI)-based radiomic findings distinguish MS from its mimics. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. 2022;61:103756. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103756 EDN: WYOVXD
- Yan Z, Liu H, Chen X, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping-derived radiomic features in discriminating multiple sclerosis from neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2021;15:765634. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.765634 EDN: FKRFCS
- Luo X, Piao S, Li H, et al. Multi-lesion radiomics model for discrimination of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. European Radiology. 2022;32(8):5700–5710. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08653-2 EDN: XSWOTT
- Lei M, Varghese B, Hwang D, et al. Benchmarking various radiomic toolkit features while applying the image biomarker standardization initiative toward clinical translation of radiomic analysis. Journal of Digital Imaging. 2021;34(5):1156–1170. doi: 10.1007/s10278-021-00506-6 EDN: DLKPOY
- Kocak B, Akinci D’Antonoli T, Mercaldo N, et al. METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS): a quality scoring tool for radiomics research endorsed by EuSoMII. Insights into Imaging. 2024;15(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01572-w EDN: CINMDC
- Traboulsee A, Simon JH, Stone L, et al. Revised recommendations of the consortium of MS centers task force for a standardized MRI protocol and clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and follow-up of multiple sclerosis. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2015;37(3):394–401. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4539
- Cè M, Chiriac MD, Cozzi A, et al. Decoding radiomics: a step-by-step guide to machine learning workflow in hand-crafted and deep learning radiomics studies. Diagnostics. 2024;14(22):2473. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14222473 EDN: ZZVPJL
- Wichtmann BD, Harder FN, Weiss K, et al. Influence of image processing on radiomic features from magnetic resonance imaging. Investigative Radiology. 2022;58(3):199–208. doi: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000921 EDN: QBHJLD
- Krotenkova MV, Sergeeva AN, Morozova SN, et al. Neuroimaging. Brain. Moscow: Human Health; 2022. (In Russ.) Available from: https://rusneb.ru/catalog/000199_000009_011565152
- Chernyaeva GN, Morozov SP, Vladzimirskyy AV. The quality of artificial intelligence algorithms for identifying manifestations of multiple sclerosis on magnetic resonance imaging (systematic review). Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology. 2021;15(4):54–65. doi: 10.54101/ACEN.2021.4.6 EDN: ZUQHJJ
- Zwanenburg A, Vallières M, Abdalah MA, et al. The image biomarker standardization initiative: standardized quantitative radiomics for high-throughput image-based phenotyping. Radiology. 2020;295(2):328–338. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020191145 EDN: HZVKJN
- Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM, et al. Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology. 2017;14(12):749–762. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.141
- Orzan F, Iancu D, Dioşan L, Bálint Z. Textural analysis and artificial intelligence as decision support tools in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis — a systematic review. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2025;18:1457420. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1457420
- Kelly BS, Mathur P, McGuinness G, et al. A radiomic “warning sign” of progression on brain MRI in individuals with MS. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2024;45(2):236–243. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.a8104 EDN: HVADZW
- Fiscone C, Rundo L, Lugaresi A, et al. Assessing robustness of quantitative susceptibility-based MRI radiomic features in patients with multiple sclerosis. Scientific Reports. 2023;13(1):16239. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42914-4 EDN: GYFOEM
- Rostami A, Robatjazi M, Dareyni A, et al. Enhancing classification of active and non-active lesions in multiple sclerosis: machine learning models and feature selection techniques. BMC Medical Imaging. 2024;24(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01528-6 EDN: UGXSIX
补充文件



