GENETIC DIVERSITY OF THE AMUR TIGER ( PANTHERA TIGRIS ALTAICA ): ARE THERE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE 20 AND THE BEGINNING OF THE 21 CENTURIES?

P. A. Sorokin; Сорокин П. А.; V. G. Udin; Юдин В. Г.; S. V. Naidenko; Найденко С. В.; J. A. Hernandez-Blanco; Эрнандес-Бланко Х. А.; M. D. Chistopolova; Чистополова М. Д.; V. V. Rozhnov; Рожнов В. В.

doi:10.31857/S268673892360019X

GENETIC DIVERSITY OF THE AMUR TIGER (PANTHERA TIGRIS ALTAICA): ARE THERE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE 20 AND THE BEGINNING OF THE 21 CENTURIES?

Autores: Sorokin P.A.¹, Udin V.G.², Naidenko S.V.¹, Hernandez-Blanco J.A.¹, Chistopolova M.D.¹, Rozhnov V.V.¹
Afiliações:
1. A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences
2. Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Edição: Volume 512, Nº 1 (2023)
Páginas: 500-505
Seção: Articles
URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2686-7389/article/view/140864
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S268673892360019X
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PHZCOG
ID: 140864

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado

Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado

Somente assinantes

Resumo
Sobre autores
Bibliografia
Arquivos suplementares
Estatísticas

Resumo

The polymorphism of 9 microsatellite loci of the Sikhote-Alin tiger population in the modern and recent historical period was analyzed using blood, excrement, and museum bone samples. Tests for a population going through a period of low abundance in the analysis of excess heterozygotes and a low value of the Garza-Williamson coefficient indicate a high probability of such events in the recent and historical past. The mean effective population size Ne for the current sample was 34.4 (95% range 17–106.8). This fact is of great interest for the conservation and restoration of endangered large cat species.

Palavras-chave

Sikhote-Alin population, historical and modern samples, bottleneck

Bibliografia

Рожнов В.В., Найденко С.В., Эрнандес-Бланко Х.А., Чистополова М.Д., и др. // Зоол. журн. 2021. Т. 100. № 1. С. 79–103.
Капланов Л.Г. // Тигр. Изюбрь. Лось. М.: Изд-во Моск. о-ва испытателей природы. 1948. Новая серия. Отд. зоол. Вып. 14 (29). С. 18–49.
Матюшкин Е.Н., Пикунов Д.Г., Дунишенко Ю.М., Микуэлл Д., и др. // Редкие виды млекопитающих России и сопредельных территорий. М.: ВТО РАН. 1999. С. 242–271.
Дунишенко Ю.М., Арамилев С.В. Амурский тигр: некоронованный властелин тайги. М.: АНО “Центр “Амурский тигр“. 2020. 96 с.
Sorokin P.A., Rozhnov V.V., Krasnenko A.U., Lukarevskiy V.S., et al. // Integrative Zoology. 2016. V. 11. № 1. P. 25–32.
Piry S., Luikart G., Cornuet J.M. // Journal of Heredity. 1999. V. 90. P. 502–503.
Garza J.C., Williamson E.G. // Molecular Ecology. 2001. V. 10. P. 305–318.
Excoffier L.G., Lischer H.E.L. // Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2010. V. 10. P. 564–567.
Do C., Waples R.S., Peel D., Macbeth G.M., et al. // Molecular Ecology Resources. 2014. V. 14(1). P. 209–214.
Goudet J. Fstat (ver. 2.9.4), a program to estimate and test population genetics parameters. 2003. Available from http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat. html Updated from Goudet [1995].
Peery M.Z., Kirby R., Reid B.N., Stoelting R., et al. // Molecular ecology. 2012. P. 21 (14). P. 3403–3418.
Henry P., Miquelle D., Sugimoto T., Mccullough D.R., et al. // Molecular Ecology. 2009. V. 18. Issue 15. P. 3173–3184.
Alasaad S., Soriguer R.C., Chelomina G., Sushitsky Y.P., Joerns Fickel J. // Mammalian Biology. 2011. Vol. 76. P. 722–726.
Russello M.A., Gladyshev E., Miquelle D., Caccone A. // Conservation Genetics. 2004. V. 5. P. 707–713.
Driscoll C.A., Yamaguchi N.C., Bar-Gal G. K., Roca A.L., et al. // PLoS ONE. 2009. 4 (1). P. 1–8.