Unilateral sanctions and countermeasures in international law: problems of legitimacy and proportionality

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

The article is devoted to the analysis of restrictive measures of the European Union in the context of their compliance with the norms of international law. The purpose of the article is to assess the legality of certain restrictive EU measures in terms of international legal standards. It has been established that the basis for the introduction of restrictive measures is a subjective assessment of the «actual situation» by the EU itself, which gives the EU Council broad discretionary powers. Special attention is paid to the analysis of intellectual property sanctions against the Russian Federation, as well as to the assessment of the proportionality of measures such as asset freezes and broadcasting bans. As a solution, it is proposed to develop legal mechanisms to protect the rights of persons wrongfully affected by sanctions, and to require the EU to strictly comply with the procedural conditions for the use of countermeasures, as well as to assess their humanitarian consequences.

Sobre autores

Ekaterina Sviridova

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: ESviridova@fa.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-7791-0550
Código SPIN: 9514-6466

Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of legal regulation of economic activity

Rússia, Moscow

Bibliografia

  1. Burdeau G. Le gel d’avoirs étrangers. 1997. JDI. No. 7. Рp. 5–57.
  2. Daphné D. Les sanctions de l’Union européenne contre les États tiers // Annuaire français de droit international. 2021. No. 67. Рp. 119–142.
  3. Hofer A. The Developed/Developing Divide on Unilateral Coercive Measures: Legitimate Enforcement or Illegitimate Intervention? Chinese JIL. 2017. Vol. 16, No. 2. Рp. 175–214.
  4. Paddeu F. Countermeasures. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. 2015. No. 11. Рp. 325.
  5. SalMon J. Dictionnaire de droit international public. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 2001. 1198 p. ISBN: 9-782-80271-520-7.
  6. Keshner M.V. Issues of the Legitimacy of Restriction by Countermeasures of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction of the State. Journal of Russian Law. 2021. Vol. 25, No. 3. Рp. 152–171. (In Rus.). doi: 10.12737/jrl.2021.041.
  7. Shakhnazarov B.А., Shakhnazarovа Е.А. Мain problems of intellectual property protection in sanction environment. Intellectual Property. Industrial Property. 2022. No. 10. Рp. 17–25. (In Rus.). EDN: QRTXTH.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML


Creative Commons License
Este artigo é disponível sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição–NãoComercial–SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).