Сomparative analysis of second and religious understanding of the essence of technology
- Authors: Rodionov D.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Samara National Research University
- Issue: Vol 21, No 7-8 (2021)
- Pages: 19-23
- Section: Philosophical sciences
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/2410-3764/article/view/80730
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.55531/2072-2354.2021.21.4.19-23
- ID: 80730
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
This article is devoted to the comparative analysis of secular and religious understanding of the essence of technology. The author shows that secular and religious understanding of the technology essence has not only differences, but also many similarities. S.N. Bulgakov was taken as an apologist for the religious point of view, describing the technique through the Divine Will and Sophia. And as an example of secular perception, the works of P.K. Engelmeier were described, who defended the position of technology as a form of human spiritual activity in the design of matter through the reconstruction of natural resources in accordance with the goals of culture.
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Denis A. Rodionov
Samara National Research University
Author for correspondence.
Email: den89pank@gmail.com
full-time postgraduate student of the Social and Humanitarian Institute
Russian Federation, SamaraReferences
- Bagdasaryan NG, Gorohov VG, Nazaretyan AP. Istoriya, filosofiya i metodologiya nauki i tekhniki: uchebnik dlya magistrov. Moscow; 2015. (In Russ.)
- Berdyaev NA. Vozrozhdenie Pravoslaviya (o. S. Bulgakov). In: Berdyaev NA. Sobranie sochinenii: v 4 т. Paris: YMCA Press, cop.; 1989. Vol. III. P. 580–621. (In Russ.)
- Bulgakov SN. Svet nevechernii. Sozertsaniya i umozreniya. Moscow: Respublika; 1994. (In Russ.)
- Bulgakov SN. Filosofiya hozyaistva. Moscow: Institut russkoi tsivilizatsii; 2009. (In Russ.)
- Gorokhov VG. Petr Kliment’evich Engel’meier. Inzhener-mekhanik i filosof tekhniki. Moscow: Nauka; 1997. (In Russ.)
- Gorokhov VG, Rozin VM. Vvedenie v filosofiyu tekhniki: uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov. Moscow; 1998. (In Russ.)
- Lysikova SV. P.K. Engel’meier kak osnovatel’ filosofii tekhniki v Rossii [Internet]. (In Russ.). Available from: http://masters.donntu.org/2009/eltf/lysikova/library/filosofiya.htm Accessed: 15.09.2021.
- Nekrasov SI, Nekrasova NA. Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki: tematicheskii slovar’ spravochnik: uchebnoe posobie. Oryol; 2010. (In Russ.)
- Platon. Sochineniya: v 4 t. Ed. by A.F. Losev, V.F. Asmus. Saint Petersburg; 2007. Vol. 3, Part 1. (In Russ.)
- Simondon J. About the way of existence of technical objects [Internet]. Translit. 2011;(9):94–105. (In Russ.). Available from: https://www.academia.edu/15414715. Accessed: 15.09.2021.
- Eloyan MR. S.N. Bulgakov: Pravoslavie i kapitalizm (filosofiya hozyaistva). Rostov-na-Donu; 2004. (In Russ.)
- Engel’meier PK. Teoriya tvorchestva. Saint Petersburg: Obrazovanie; 1910. (In Russ.)
- Engel’mejer PK. Filosofiya tekhniki. Vyp. 1. Obshchii obzor predmeta. Moscow: t-vo skoropech. A.A. Levenson; 1912. (In Russ.)
- Engel’mejer PK. Ekonomicheskoe znachenie sovremennoi tekhniki. Moscow: Russkaya tipolitografiya; 1887. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
