Assessment of fire Risks in Russian Federation in General and its Megacities Using the Example of Moscow and St. Petersburg, 2009-2021

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Resumo

Summary. The purpose of the study is, in connection with the change in the procedure for statistical recording of fires, to assess their health consequences in the Russian Federation as a whole and its megacities using the example of Moscow and St. Petersburg for 13 years (2009–2021). Materials and methods of research. Data on the number of fires was taken from the Federal Database “Fires” [https://sites.google.com/site/statistikapozaro/]; population size – on the Rosstat website [https://rosstat.gov.ru/]. Retrospectively, fire statistics since 2009 have included fires. The results of the study were checked for normal distribution of characteristics. The dynamics of indicators was studied using the analysis of time series, for which a 2nd order polynomial trend was used, etc.Research results and their analysis. As a result of the study, the following risks were calculated for the population of the Russian Federation as a whole, Moscow and St. Petersburg: the risk of being caught in a fire; risk of dying in a fire; risk of injury in a fire; individual risk of dying in a fire per 100 thousand population; individual risk of injury in a fire per 100 thousand population. Conclusions: As a rule, the magnitude of individual fire risks in megacities, due to the coordinated work of fire crews during fire fighting, evacuation of people and a number of other circumstances, was less than in the Russian Federation as a whole; there is also a downward trend. The individual risk of death in a fire in Moscow and St. Petersburg was low for Russia; in Moscow the individual risk of injury was low, in St. Petersburg it was average. The calculated new fire risks can be used when carrying out more targeted work to reduce them in the regions of the Russian Federation.

Sobre autores

V. Evdokimov

Nikiforov Russian Center of Emergency and Radiation Medicine, EMERCOM of Russia

Email: 9334616@mail.ru
Dr. Sc. (Med.), Prof.; Principal Research Associate St. Petersburg

V. Sibirko

All-Russian Research Institute for Fire Protection, EMERCOM of Russia

Email: 9334616@mail.ru
Balashikha, Moscow region

S. Shapovalov

Nikiforov Russian Center of Emergency and Radiation Medicine, EMERCOM of Russia

Email: 9334616@mail.ru
St. Petersburg

Yu. Yunusova

Nikiforov Russian Center of Emergency and Radiation Medicine, EMERCOM of Russia

Email: 9334616@mail.ru
St. Petersburg

V. Martynov

All-Russian Research Institute for Fire Protection, EMERCOM of Russia

Email: 9334616@mail.ru
Balashikha, Moscow region

Bibliografia

  1. Spencer L . J ., Lucchesi L . R . , Bisignano C ., et al. Epidemiology of injuries from fire, heat and hot substances: global, regional and national morbidity and mortality estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2017 study // Inj. Prev. 2020. Vol. 26, Supp 1. Pp. i36–i45. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043299.
  2. Stanaway J.D., Afshin A., Gakidou E., et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 // Lancet. 2018. Vol. 392, No. 10159. Pp. 1923–1994. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30750-9.
  3. Брушлинский Н.Н., Соколов С.В., Григорьева М.П. Сравнительный анализ обстановки с пожарами в странах мира // Пожары и чрезвычайные ситуации: предотвращение, ликвидация. 2022. № 4. С. 5–12. doi: 10.25257/FE.2022.4.5-12.
  4. World of Fire Statistics: Report / Center of Fire Statistics of CTIF. [S.L.]. 2023. No. 28. 144 p. [Electronic resource] URL: https://ctif.org/.
  5. Полехин П.В., Чебуханов М.А., Козлов А.А. и др. Пожары и пожарная безопасность в 2020 году. Статистика пожаров и их последствий: Стат.-аналит. сб. / Под общ. ред. Гордиенко Д.М. М.: ВНИИПО, 2021. 112 с.
  6. Брушлинский Н.Н., Соколов С.В., Клепко Е.А. и др. Динамика и анализ рисков гибели детей и взрослых при пожарах в Российской Федерации за 1991–2008 гг. // Пожары и чрезвычайные ситуации: предотвращение, ликвидация. 2009. № 4. С. 21–25.
  7. Харисов Г.Х. Фирсов А.В. Обоснование оптимального значения индивидуального пожарного риска в Российской Федерации // Безопасность жизнедеятельности. 2018. № 7. С. 36–42.
  8. Якуш С.Е., Эсманский Р.К. Анализ пожарных рисков // Проблемы анализа риска. 2009. Т. 6. Ч. I: Подходы и методы. № 3. С. 8–27. Ч. II: Проблемы применения. № 4. С. 26–46.
  9. Пожарные риски / Под ред. Брушлинского Н.Н. М.: ВНИИПО МЧС России, 2004. Вып. 1. Основные понятия. 47 с.; Вып. 2. Динамика пожарных рисков. 66 с.
  10. Афанасьев В.Н., Юзбашев М.М. Анализ временных рядов и прогнозирование. М.: Финансы и статистика, Инфра-М, 2015. 320 с.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML


Creative Commons License
Este artigo é disponível sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).