Dealumination of Nanosized Zeolites Y
- Authors: Yakimov A.V.1, Zasukhin D.S.1, Vorobkalo V.A.1, Ponomareva O.A.1,2, Knyazeva E.E.2, Zaikovskii V.I.3,4, Kolozhvari B.A.1, Ivanova I.I.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Faculty of Chemistry, Moscow State University
- Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis, Russian Academy of Sciences
- Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Russian Academy of Sciences
- Novosibirsk State University
- Issue: Vol 59, No 5 (2019)
- Pages: 540-545
- Section: Article
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/0965-5441/article/view/180873
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544119050116
- ID: 180873
Cite item
Abstract
The dealumination of nanosized zeolites is an important scientific problem, which should be solved to improve the activity of catalysts based on this zeolite in a broad range of heterogeneous catalytic reactions, particularly in commercial processes. However, the smaller the required size of the synthesized crystals, the lower the Si/Al ratio and the lower the degree of dealumination of this material can be achieved. In this study, the dealumination of zeolites Y with a crystal size of 50–1100 nm by treatment with ammonium hexafluorosilicate and steam heat treatment is discussed. It is shown that the dealumination with ammonium hexafluorosilicate is a “gentler” method in terms of structure preservation, whereas the dealumination by steam heat treatment provides a higher Si/Al ratio in the products; however, this method is inapplicable for crystals smaller than 500 nm, because it leads to the complete degradation of the structure. However, nanosized crystals can be dealuminated by treating with ammonium hexafluorosilicate. In this case, the degree of dealumination is close to 40%. A significant disadvantage of this method is the formation of a SiO2 film on the crystal surface; this feature substantially restricts the use of the ammonium hexafluorosilicate treatment in the synthesis of cracking catalysts.
Keywords
About the authors
A. V. Yakimov
Faculty of Chemistry, Moscow State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: alex.yakimov.20@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991
D. S. Zasukhin
Faculty of Chemistry, Moscow State University
Email: alex.yakimov.20@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991
V. A. Vorobkalo
Faculty of Chemistry, Moscow State University
Email: alex.yakimov.20@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991
O. A. Ponomareva
Faculty of Chemistry, Moscow State University; Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: alex.yakimov.20@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991; Moscow, 119991
E. E. Knyazeva
Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: alex.yakimov.20@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991
V. I. Zaikovskii
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Russian Academy of Sciences; Novosibirsk State University
Email: alex.yakimov.20@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090; Novosibirsk, 630090
B. A. Kolozhvari
Faculty of Chemistry, Moscow State University
Email: alex.yakimov.20@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991
I. I. Ivanova
Faculty of Chemistry, Moscow State University; Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: alex.yakimov.20@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991; Moscow, 119991
Supplementary files
