Comparison of FDA (2018) and EAEU Regulatory Requirements for Bioanalytical Method Validation
- Авторы: Uvarova N.E.1, Eremenko N.N.1,2, Ramenskaya G.V.1,2, Goryachev D.V.1, Smirnov V.V.1,2
- 
							Учреждения: 
							- Scientific Center for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
- I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
 
- Выпуск: Том 53, № 8 (2019)
- Страницы: 759-765
- Раздел: Structure of Chemical Compounds, Methods of Analysis and Process Control
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/0091-150X/article/view/245986
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11094-019-02075-z
- ID: 245986
Цитировать
Аннотация
US FDA requirements published in the new 2018 guidance for bioanalytical method validation and the necessity to confirm their reliability for determining analyte concentrations are reviewed. The history of regulations for bioanalytical method validation is briefly described. The key changes and additions to the FDA guidance for bioanalytical method validation that include unified requirements for chromatographic and ligand-binding method validation, instructions for biomarker validation, a separate section focused on new technologies (e.g., dry blood-spot method), and introduction of the fit-for-purpose concept are discussed. FDA and EAEU requirements for validation of chromatographic assay parameters are compared. In general, the requirements of the new FDA guidance and the EAEU agree despite several differences in the number of parameters and their acceptance criteria.
Ключевые слова
Об авторах
N. Uvarova
Scientific Center for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
							Автор, ответственный за переписку.
							Email: uvarova@expmed.ru
				                					                																			                												                	Россия, 							8/2 Petrovskii Blvd., Moscow, 127051						
N. Eremenko
Scientific Center for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
														Email: uvarova@expmed.ru
				                					                																			                												                	Россия, 							8/2 Petrovskii Blvd., Moscow, 127051; 8/2 Trubetskaya St., Moscow, 119991						
G. Ramenskaya
Scientific Center for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
														Email: uvarova@expmed.ru
				                					                																			                												                	Россия, 							8/2 Petrovskii Blvd., Moscow, 127051; 8/2 Trubetskaya St., Moscow, 119991						
D. Goryachev
Scientific Center for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
														Email: uvarova@expmed.ru
				                					                																			                												                	Россия, 							8/2 Petrovskii Blvd., Moscow, 127051						
V. Smirnov
Scientific Center for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
														Email: uvarova@expmed.ru
				                					                																			                												                	Россия, 							8/2 Petrovskii Blvd., Moscow, 127051; 8/2 Trubetskaya St., Moscow, 119991						
Дополнительные файлы
 
				
			 
						 
					 
						 
						 
						 
									 
  
  
  
  
  Отправить статью по E-mail
			Отправить статью по E-mail  Открытый доступ
		                                Открытый доступ Доступ предоставлен
						Доступ предоставлен Только для подписчиков
		                                		                                        Только для подписчиков
		                                					