Efficacy and safety profile of minocycline in patients with urogenital chlamydia infection: results of an open randomized comparative clinical trial
- Authors: Rakhmatulina M.R.1
-
Affiliations:
- State Research Center of Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology
- Issue: Vol 99, No 5 (2023)
- Pages: 75-83
- Section: ORIGINAL STUDIES
- URL: https://ogarev-online.ru/0042-4609/article/view/217594
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.25208/vdv11877
- ID: 217594
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Background. Urogenital chlamydia infections is a widespread STI, 131 million people are infected every year. Despite the absence of a reliable correlation with respect to antimicrobial resistance of chlamydia strains to tetracyclines, macrolides and fluoroquinolones in vitro and in vivo, scientists are studying the issue of reducing the sensitivity of the pathogen to traditionally used drugs and are investigating the effectiveness of antibacterial drugs active against Chlamydia trachomatis. One of the drugs with high anti-chlamydia activity is minocycline.
Aims. To study the efficacy and safety of the minocycline (Minolexin®) in the treatment of urogenital chlamydia infection in comparison with the doxycycline (Unidox Solutab®).
Methods. An open randomized comparative clinical trial included 100 patients: group 1 — 50 patients who received minocycline 100 mg 2 times a day for 7 days, group 2 — 50 patients who received doxycycline 100 mg 2 times a day in within 7 days. The diagnosis was confirmed by the detection of C. trachomatis by PCR. The parameter of the effectiveness of therapy was the eradication of C. trachomatis and the absence of clinical symptoms 4 weeks after therapy.
Results. 1 week after therapy, clinical symptoms were registered in 20; 40.8% patients of group 1 and 28 (57.1%) patients of group 2 (p = 0.106), 4 weeks later — in 4; 8.2% patients of group 1 and 7 (18.4%) patients of group 2 (p = 0.524). In group 1, the absence of most subjective clinical symptoms was recorded in a shorter time than in the comparison group. 100% of patients had achieved eradication C. trachomatis, laboratory signs of an inflammatory reaction were recorded in 2 (5.0%) patients of group 1 and 3 (7.3%) patients of group 2 (p = 1,000). According to the frequency of adverse drug events, there were also no significant differences between the compared groups, however, in group 2 patients, adverse drug events that had a high probability of being associated with taking the drug were recorded more often than in the group of patients receiving minocycline.
Conclusions. The results of the study demonstrated the comparable effectiveness of minocycline and doxycycline in the treatment of urogenital chlamydia infection and a similar safety profile of these drugs.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Margarita R. Rakhmatulina
State Research Center of Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology
Author for correspondence.
Email: rahmatulina@cnikvi.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3039-7769
SPIN-code: 6222-8684
Scopus Author ID: 55312504700
ResearcherId: I-5449-2014
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Global health sector strategies on, respectively, HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmitted infections for the period 2022–2030. URL: http://apps.who.int/iris
- Rekart ML, Gilbert M, Meza R, Kim PH, Chang M, Money DM, et al. Chlamydia public health programs and the epidemiology of pelvic inflammatory disease and ectopic pregnancy. J Infect Dis. 2013;207(1):30–38. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis644
- Bender N, Herrmann B, Andersen B, Hocking JS, van Bergen J, Morgan J, et al. Chlamydia infection, pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy and infertility: cross-national study. Sex Transm Infect. 2011;87(7):601–608. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2011-050205
- Trabert B, Waterboer T, Idahl A, Brenner N, Brinton LA, Butt J, et al. Antibodies against Chlamydia trachomatis and ovarian cancer risk in two independent populations. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111(2):129–136. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy084
- Arcia Franchini AP, Iskander B, Anwer F, Oliveri F, Fotios K, Panday P, et al. The role of Chlamydia trachomatis in the pathogenesis of cervical cancer. Cureus. 2022;14(1):e21331. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21331
- Хламидийная инфекция: клинические рекомендации. [Hlamidijnaya infekciya: Klinicheskie rekomendacii. (In Russ.)] URL: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/194_1
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2010. URL: http:// www.cdc.gov/std/stats11/surv2011.pdf
- Lanjouw E, Ouburg S, de Vries HJ, Stary A, Radcliffe K, Unemo M. 2015 European guideline on the management of Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Int J STD AIDS. 2016;27(5):333–348. doi: 10.1177/0956462415618837
- Hooton TM, Rogers ME, Medina TG, Kuwamura LE, Ewers C, Roberts PL, et al. Ciprofloxacin compared with doxycycline for nongonococcal urethritis. Ineffectiveness against Chlamydia trachomatis due to relapsing infection. JAMA. 1990;264(11):1418–1421.
- Somani J, Bhullar VB, Workowski KA, Farshy CE, Black CM. Multiple drug-resistant Chlamydia trachomatis associated with clinical treatment failure. J Infect Dis. 2000;181(4):1421–1427. doi: 10.1086/315372
- Jones RB, Van der Pol B, Martin DH, Shepard MK. Partial characterization of Chlamydia trachomatis isolates resistant to multiple antibiotics. J Infect Dis. 1990;162(6):1309–1315. doi: 10.1093/infdis/162.6.1309
- Misyurina OY, Chipitsyna EV, Finashutina YP, Lazarev VN, Akopian TA, Savicheva AM, et al. Mutations in a 23S rRNA gene of Chlamydia trachomatis associated with resistance to macrolides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48(4):1347–1349. doi: 10.1128/aac.48.4.1347-1349.2004
- Benamri I, Azzouzi M, Sanak K, Moussa A, Radouani F. An overview of genes and mutations associated with Chlamydiae species’ resistance to antibiotics. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2021;20(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12941-021-00465-4
- Lefèvre JC, Lépargneur JP. Comparative in vitro susceptibility of a tetracycline-resistant Chlamydia trachomatis strain isolated in Toulouse (France). Sex Transm Dis. 1998;25(7):350–352. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199808000-00005
- Horner PJ. Azithromycin antimicrobial resistance and genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection: duration of therapy may be the key to improving efficacy. Sex Transm Infect. 2012;88(3):154–156. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2011-050385
- Sandoz KM, Rockey DD. Antibiotic resistance in Chlamydiae. Future Microbiol. 2010;5(9):1427–1442. doi: 10.2217/fmb.10.96
- Wang SA, Papp JR, Stamm WE, Peeling RW, Martin DH, Holmes KK. Evaluation of antimicrobial resist- ance and treatment failures for Chlamydia trachomatis: a meeting report. J Infect Dis. 2005;191(6):917–923. doi: 10.1086/428290
- O’Neill CE, Seth-Smith HM, Van Der Pol B, Harris SR, Thomson NR, Cutcliffe LT, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis clinical isolates identified as tetracycline resistant do not exhibit resistance in vitro: whole-genome sequencing reveals a mutation in porB but no evidence for tetracycline resistance genes. Microbiology (Reading). 2013;159(Pt4):748–756. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.065391-0
- Leyden JJ, Del Rosso JQ. Oral antibiotic therapy for acne vulgaris: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic perspectives. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2011;4(2):40–47.
- Torok HM. Extended-release formulation of minocycline in the treatment of moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris in patients over the age of 12 years. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2013;6(7):19–22.
- Jung GW, Tse JE, Guiha I, Rao J. Prospective, randomized, open-label trial comparing the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of an acne treatment regimen with and without a probiotic supplement and minocycline in subjects with mild to moderate acne. J Cutan Med Surg. 2013;17(2):114–122. doi: 10.2310/7750.2012.12026
- Kovacs GT, Westcott M, Rusden J, Asche V, King H, Haynes SE, et al. A prospective single-blind trial of minocycline and doxycycline in the treatment of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women. Med J Aust. 1989;150(9):483–485. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1989.tb136591.x
- Romanowski B, Talbot H, Stadnyk M, Kowalchuk P, Bowie WR. Minocycline compared with doxycycline in the treatment of nongonococcal urethritis and mucopurulent cervicitis. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119(1):16–22. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-1-199307010-00003
- Oriel JD, Reeve P, Nicol CS. Minocycline in the treatment of nongonococcal urethritis: its effect on Chlamydia trachomatis. J Am Vener Dis Assoc. 1975;2(1):17–22.
- Donati M, Rodrìguez Fermepin M, Olmo A, D’Apote L, Cevenini R. Comparative in-vitro activity of moxifloxacin, minocycline and azithromycin against Chlamydia spp. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999;43(6):825–827. doi: 10.1093/jac/43.6.825
- Barza M, Brown RB, Shanks C, Gamble C, Weinstein L. Relation between lipophilicity and pharmacological behavior of minocycline, doxycycline, tetracycline, and oxytetracycline in dogs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975;8(6):713–720. doi: 10.1128/AAC.8.6.713
Supplementary files
